VAZ 2109 1990 vs Mazda 626 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 NM | 173 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Mazda 626 is a more dynamic driving. VAZ 2109 engine produces 49 HP less power than Mazda 626, whereas torque is 73 NM less than Mazda 626. Due to the lower power, VAZ 2109 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 8.0 | |
|
The VAZ 2109 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. VAZ 2109 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626, which means that by driving the VAZ 2109 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda 626 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.01 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.39 m | |
|
VAZ 2109 is smaller, but slightly higher. VAZ 2109 is 69 cm shorter than the Mazda 626, 10 cm narrower, while the height of VAZ 2109 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 747 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage space. VAZ 2109 has 125 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 626. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 5.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the VAZ 2109 is 5.4 metres less than that of the Mazda 626, which means VAZ 2109 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`370 | 1`675 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
VAZ 2109 has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |