VAZ 2109 1990 vs Renault Clio 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 6.7 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. VAZ 2109 engine produces 132 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 140 NM less than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, VAZ 2109 reaches 100 km/h speed 7.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.3 | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. VAZ 2109 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the VAZ 2109 could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.01 m | 4.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.43 m | |
|
VAZ 2109 is smaller. VAZ 2109 is 8 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 8 cm narrower, while the height of VAZ 2109 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 300 litres | |
|
VAZ 2109 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, VAZ 2109 has 30 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. The Renault Clio may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 5.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`370 | 1`714 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
VAZ 2109 has
|
Renault Clio has
| |