VAZ 2109 1990 vs Mazda 323 1989
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Mazda 323 is a more dynamic driving. VAZ 2109 engine produces 22 HP less power than Mazda 323, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Mazda 323. Due to the lower power, VAZ 2109 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 7.4 | |
|
The VAZ 2109 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. VAZ 2109 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323, which means that by driving the VAZ 2109 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda 323 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.01 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.34 m | |
|
VAZ 2109 is smaller, but higher. VAZ 2109 is 25 cm shorter than the Mazda 323, 3 cm narrower, while the height of VAZ 2109 is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 5.2 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the VAZ 2109 is 4.6 metres less than that of the Mazda 323, which means VAZ 2109 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`370 | 1`550 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
VAZ 2109 has
|
Mazda 323 has
| |