VAZ 2109 1990 vs Fiat Croma 1993
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 162 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Fiat Croma is a more dynamic driving. VAZ 2109 engine produces 94 HP less power than Fiat Croma, whereas torque is 113 NM less than Fiat Croma. Due to the lower power, VAZ 2109 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 10.0 | |
|
The VAZ 2109 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. VAZ 2109 consumes 3.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Croma, which means that by driving the VAZ 2109 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 480 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.01 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.44 m | |
|
VAZ 2109 is smaller. VAZ 2109 is 51 cm shorter than the Fiat Croma, 11 cm narrower, while the height of VAZ 2109 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 5.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the VAZ 2109 is 5.4 metres less than that of the Fiat Croma, which means VAZ 2109 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`370 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
VAZ 2109 has
|
Fiat Croma has
| |