VAZ 2109 1990 vs Mazda 2 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 78 HP | 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 NM | 137 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Mazda 2 is a more dynamic driving. VAZ 2109 engine produces 25 HP less power than Mazda 2, whereas torque is 21 NM less than Mazda 2. Due to the lower power, VAZ 2109 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 5.9 | |
|
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. VAZ 2109 consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the VAZ 2109 could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.01 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.48 m | |
| VAZ 2109 is 11 cm longer than the Mazda 2, 5 cm narrower, while the height of VAZ 2109 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 787 litres | |
| VAZ 2109 has 20 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`370 | 1`485 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
VAZ 2109 has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |