VAZ 2109 1987 vs Renault Clio 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 6.7 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. VAZ 2109 engine produces 60 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 54 NM less than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, VAZ 2109 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 6.3 | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. VAZ 2109 consumes 3.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the VAZ 2109 could require 555 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 430 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.01 m | 4.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.43 m | |
|
VAZ 2109 is smaller. VAZ 2109 is 8 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 8 cm narrower, while the height of VAZ 2109 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 300 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`465 | 1`714 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
VAZ 2109 has
|
Renault Clio has
| |