VAZ 2109 1987 vs Mazda 2 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 121 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
VAZ 2109 is more dynamic to drive. VAZ 2109 engine produces 65 HP more power than Mazda 2, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Mazda 2. Thanks to more power VAZ 2109 reaches 100 km/h speed 5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 5.4 | |
|
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. VAZ 2109 consumes 4.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the VAZ 2109 could require 690 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 430 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Mazda 2 2007 1.3 engine: The engine is generally robust, but the use of poor-quality fuel can lead to increased burn formation. Idling speeds tend to be unstable. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.01 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.48 m | |
| VAZ 2109 is 11 cm longer than the Mazda 2, 5 cm narrower, while the height of VAZ 2109 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 787 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`465 | 1`480 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
VAZ 2109 has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |