VAZ 2106 1982 vs Mitsubishi Galant 1997

 
VAZ 2106
1982 - 1990
Mitsubishi Galant
1997 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.3 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 64 HP136 HP
Torque: 92 NM178 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 19 seconds9.7 seconds
Mitsubishi Galant is a more dynamic driving.
VAZ 2106 engine produces 72 HP less power than Mitsubishi Galant, whereas torque is 86 NM less than Mitsubishi Galant. Due to the lower power, VAZ 2106 reaches 100 km/h speed 9.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.58.5
The Mitsubishi Galant is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
VAZ 2106 consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Galant, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the VAZ 2106 could require 300 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 39 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 370 km in combined cycle750 km in combined cycle
500 km on highway960 km on highway
Mitsubishi Galant gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Mitsubishi Galant) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (VAZ 2106) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.17 m4.63 m
Width: 1.61 m1.74 m
Height: 1.44 m1.42 m
VAZ 2106 is smaller, but slightly higher.
VAZ 2106 is 46 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Galant, 13 cm narrower, while the height of VAZ 2106 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 345 litres470 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1400 litres
Mitsubishi Galant has more luggage space.
VAZ 2106 has 125 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Galant.
Turning diameter: no data10.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`4351`850
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 22002000
Pros and Cons:
    Mitsubishi Galant has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • roomier boot
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv