VAZ 2106 1982 vs Volvo S90 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 2.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 92 NM | 267 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
Volvo S90 is a more dynamic driving. VAZ 2106 engine produces 140 HP less power than Volvo S90, whereas torque is 175 NM less than Volvo S90. Due to the lower power, VAZ 2106 reaches 100 km/h speed 9.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 11.4 | |
|
The VAZ 2106 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. VAZ 2106 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S90, which means that by driving the VAZ 2106 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 39 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 370 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 500 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Volvo S90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.61 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.42 m | |
|
VAZ 2106 is smaller, but slightly higher. VAZ 2106 is 70 cm shorter than the Volvo S90, 14 cm narrower, while the height of VAZ 2106 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 345 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`435 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
VAZ 2106 has
|
Volvo S90 has
| |