VAZ 2106 1982 vs Volvo 940 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 92 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo 940 is a more dynamic driving. VAZ 2106 engine produces 58 HP less power than Volvo 940, whereas torque is 148 NM less than Volvo 940. Due to the lower power, VAZ 2106 reaches 100 km/h speed 7.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 7.9 | |
|
The Volvo 940 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. VAZ 2106 consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 940, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the VAZ 2106 could require 390 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 39 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 370 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo 940 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.61 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.41 m | |
|
VAZ 2106 is smaller, but slightly higher. VAZ 2106 is 70 cm shorter than the Volvo 940, 14 cm narrower, while the height of VAZ 2106 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 345 litres | 470 litres | |
|
Volvo 940 has more luggage space. VAZ 2106 has 125 litres less trunk space than the Volvo 940. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`435 | 1`945 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volvo 940 has
| |