VAZ 2106 1982 vs Mazda CX-3 2015
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (VAZ 2106) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Mazda CX-3) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 92 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-3 is a more dynamic driving. VAZ 2106 engine produces 41 HP less power than Mazda CX-3, whereas torque is 178 NM less than Mazda CX-3. Due to the lower power, VAZ 2106 reaches 100 km/h speed 8.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 4.7 | |
|
The Mazda CX-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. VAZ 2106 consumes 5.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the VAZ 2106 could require 870 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 39 litres | 44 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 370 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 500 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Mazda CX-3 2014: AWD system delivers 98 percent of power to the front wheels under normal conditions, and up to 50 percent of torque can be shifted to the rear wheels in the event of wheel slip. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.61 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.55 m | |
|
VAZ 2106 is smaller. VAZ 2106 is 11 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-3, 15 cm narrower, while the height of VAZ 2106 is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 345 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1260 litres | |
| VAZ 2106 has 5 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`435 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
VAZ 2106 has
|
Mazda CX-3 has
| |