VAZ 2106 1982 vs Ford Sierra 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 92 NM | 166 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Ford Sierra is a more dynamic driving. VAZ 2106 engine produces 41 HP less power than Ford Sierra, whereas torque is 74 NM less than Ford Sierra. Due to the lower power, VAZ 2106 reaches 100 km/h speed 8.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 7.5 | |
|
The Ford Sierra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. VAZ 2106 consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the VAZ 2106 could require 450 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 39 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 370 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Sierra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.61 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.41 m | |
|
VAZ 2106 is smaller, but slightly higher. VAZ 2106 is 30 cm shorter than the Ford Sierra, 9 cm narrower, while the height of VAZ 2106 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 345 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`435 | 1`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Sierra has
| |