VAZ 2106 1976 vs Mazda CX-5 2012

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
VAZ 2106
1976 - 2006
Mazda CX-5
2012 - 2015
Body: SedanCrossover / SUV
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: Manual Manual/Automatic
VAZ 2106 is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Mazda CX-5 has both automatic and manual transmission options.
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
VAZ 2106 is available only with rear wheel drive, while Mazda CX-5 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 1.3 - 1.6 (petrol)2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel)
Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mazda CX-5 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types.

Performance

Power: 64 - 75 HP150 - 192 HP
Torque: 92 - 116 NM210 - 420 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16 - 19 seconds7.9 - 10.2 seconds
In general, Mazda CX-5 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than VAZ 2106. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.9 - 10.54.6 - 7.3
VAZ 2106 petrol engines consumes on average 3.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-5.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.17 m4.54 m
Width: 1.61 m1.84 m
Height: 1.44 m1.69 m
VAZ 2106 is smaller.
VAZ 2106 is 37 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, 23 cm narrower, while the height of VAZ 2106 is 25 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 345 litres505 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
no data1620 litres
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage space.
VAZ 2106 has 160 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5.
Turning diameter: no data11.2 meters
Gross weight: ~ 1`435 kg~ 2`045 kg
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 32007400
Pros and Cons: VAZ 2106 has
  • manual gearbox only
  • only petrol engines available
  • lower price
Mazda CX-5 has
  • both manual and automatic
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • more powerful and dynamic engines
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv