VAZ 2106 1976 vs Mazda CX-3 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
| VAZ 2106 is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Mazda CX-3 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| VAZ 2106 is available only with rear wheel drive, while Mazda CX-3 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.6 (petrol) | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mazda CX-3 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 - 75 HP | 105 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 92 - 116 NM | 204 - 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16 - 19 seconds | 8.7 - 11.9 seconds | |
| In general, Mazda CX-3 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than VAZ 2106. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 - 10.5 | 4.0 - 6.4 | |
|
VAZ 2106 petrol engines consumes on average 4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.61 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.55 m | |
|
VAZ 2106 is smaller. VAZ 2106 is 11 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-3, 15 cm narrower, while the height of VAZ 2106 is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 345 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1260 litres | |
| VAZ 2106 has 5 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`435 | ~ 1`814 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
VAZ 2106 has
|
Mazda CX-3 has
| |