VAZ 2105 1980 vs Volvo 940 1990
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 50 HP | 122 HP | |
Torque: | 92 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 23 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
Volvo 940 is a more dynamic driving. VAZ 2105 engine produces 72 HP less power than Volvo 940, whereas torque is 148 NM less than Volvo 940. Due to the lower power, VAZ 2105 reaches 100 km/h speed 11.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 7.9 | |
The VAZ 2105 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. VAZ 2105 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 940, which means that by driving the VAZ 2105 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 39 litres | 75 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
Volvo 940 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 1.43 m | 4.87 m | |
Width: | 1.62 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.41 m | |
VAZ 2105 is smaller, but slightly higher. VAZ 2105 is 344 cm shorter than the Volvo 940, 13 cm narrower, while the height of VAZ 2105 is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 345 litres | 470 litres | |
Volvo 940 has more luggage space. VAZ 2105 has 125 litres less trunk space than the Volvo 940. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 9.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`395 | 1`945 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 2000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
VAZ 2105 has
|
Volvo 940 has
| |