VAZ 2105 1980 vs SAAB 90 1984
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 92 NM | 162 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
SAAB 90 is a more dynamic driving. VAZ 2105 engine produces 36 HP less power than SAAB 90, whereas torque is 70 NM less than SAAB 90. Due to the lower power, VAZ 2105 reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 39 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 390 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| SAAB 90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (SAAB 90) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (VAZ 2105) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.13 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.42 m | |
|
VAZ 2105 is smaller, but slightly higher. VAZ 2105 is 45 cm shorter than the SAAB 90, 7 cm narrower, while the height of VAZ 2105 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 345 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`395 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
SAAB 90 has
| |