VAZ 2105 1980 vs Ford Sierra 1990
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 64 HP | 220 HP | |
Torque: | 92 NM | 290 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18 seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
Ford Sierra is a more dynamic driving. VAZ 2105 engine produces 156 HP less power than Ford Sierra, whereas torque is 198 NM less than Ford Sierra. Due to the lower power, VAZ 2105 reaches 100 km/h speed 11.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 10.6 | |
The VAZ 2105 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. VAZ 2105 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra, which means that by driving the VAZ 2105 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 39 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 390 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
Ford Sierra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.13 m | 4.49 m | |
Width: | 1.62 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.38 m | |
VAZ 2105 is smaller, but higher. VAZ 2105 is 36 cm shorter than the Ford Sierra, 8 cm narrower, while the height of VAZ 2105 is 7 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 345 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 10 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`395 | 1`350 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 2000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
VAZ 2105 has
|
Ford Sierra has
| |