VAZ 2104 1997 vs Seat Inca 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 79 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Seat Inca is a more dynamic driving. VAZ 2104 engine produces 4 HP more power than Seat Inca, but torque is 8 NM less than Seat Inca. Despite the higher power, VAZ 2104 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 54 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Seat Inca) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (VAZ 2104) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.12 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1436 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`475 | 1`080 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
VAZ 2104 has
|
Seat Inca has
| |