VAZ 2104 1984 vs Mazda 626 1988
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 70 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 101 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Mazda 626 is a more dynamic driving. VAZ 2104 engine produces 39 HP less power than Mazda 626, whereas torque is 64 NM less than Mazda 626. Due to the lower power, VAZ 2104 reaches 100 km/h speed 6.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 60 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Mazda 626) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (VAZ 2104) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.12 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
|
VAZ 2104 is smaller. VAZ 2104 is 48 cm shorter than the Mazda 626, 7 cm narrower, while the height of VAZ 2104 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 345 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`475 | 1`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
VAZ 2104 has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |