Toyota iQ 2009 vs Toyota Aygo 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 55 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 130 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 16.8 seconds | |
|
Toyota iQ is more dynamic to drive. Toyota iQ engine produces 35 HP more power than Toyota Aygo, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Toyota Aygo. Thanks to more power Toyota iQ reaches 100 km/h speed 6.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.8 l/100km | 4.7 l/100km | |
|
By specification Toyota iQ consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo, which means that by driving the Toyota iQ over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota iQ consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 32 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 22 years | 2 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris, Toyota Yaris | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota iQ might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota Aygo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 2.99 m | 3.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.46 m | |
| Toyota iQ is 43 cm shorter than the Toyota Aygo, 6 cm wider, while the height of Toyota iQ is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 32 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
238 litres | 751 litres | |
|
Toyota Aygo has more luggage space. Toyota iQ has 107 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Aygo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Aygo (by 513 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 7.8 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota iQ is 1.6 metres less than that of the Toyota Aygo, which means Toyota iQ can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`285 | 1`245 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Toyota iQ has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Aygo has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Toyota iQ, so Toyota iQ quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota iQ has
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |