Toyota iQ 2009 vs Toyota Aygo 2005
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 98 HP | 68 HP | |
Torque: | 125 NM | 93 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
Toyota iQ is more dynamic to drive. Toyota iQ engine produces 30 HP more power than Toyota Aygo, whereas torque is 32 NM more than Toyota Aygo. Thanks to more power Toyota iQ reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 3.8 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota iQ consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota iQ could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota iQ consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 32 litres | 35 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
720 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
530 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Toyota Aygo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 280'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 17 years | 21 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris, Toyota Yaris, Toyota Verso | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Aygo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Toyota iQ engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Toyota iQ 2009 1.3 engine: The engine is known for its reliability but exhibits several common issues, especially as mileage increases. Owners report minor oil consumption, which tends to grow over time due to piston ring coking. Individual ignition ... More about Toyota iQ 2009 1.3 engine Toyota Aygo 2005 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 2.99 m | 3.41 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.62 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.46 m | |
Toyota iQ is 43 cm shorter than the Toyota Aygo, 6 cm wider, while the height of Toyota iQ is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 32 litres | 139 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
363 litres | 751 litres | |
Toyota Aygo has more luggage space. Toyota iQ has 107 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Aygo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Aygo (by 388 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 7.8 meters | 9.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota iQ is 1.6 metres less than that of the Toyota Aygo, which means Toyota iQ can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`270 | 1`160 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | above average | |
Toyota iQ has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Aygo has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Toyota iQ, so Toyota iQ quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 4800 | 1800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota iQ has
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |