Toyota iQ 2009 vs Citroen C1 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 91 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.2 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Citroen C1 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota iQ and Citroen C1 have the same engine power, but Toyota iQ torque is 2 NM less than Citroen C1. Toyota iQ reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 5.1 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C1 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota iQ consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C1, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota iQ could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota iQ consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C1. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 32 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 530 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C1 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 21 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 2.99 m | 3.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.63 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.47 m | |
| Toyota iQ is 46 cm shorter than the Citroen C1, 5 cm wider, while the height of Toyota iQ is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 32 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
238 litres | 751 litres | |
|
Citroen C1 has more luggage space. Toyota iQ has 107 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C1. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C1 (by 513 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 7.8 meters | 9.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota iQ is 1.7 metres less than that of the Citroen C1, which means Toyota iQ can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`210 | 1`190 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Toyota iQ scores higher in safety tests. The Toyota iQ scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Toyota iQ has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C1 has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Toyota iQ, so Toyota iQ quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota iQ has
|
Citroen C1 has
| |