Toyota iQ 2009 vs Renault Twingo 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 91 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.7 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Toyota iQ is more dynamic to drive. Toyota iQ engine produces 8 HP more power than Renault Twingo, but torque is 2 NM less than Renault Twingo. Thanks to more power Toyota iQ reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota iQ is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota iQ consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Twingo, which means that by driving the Toyota iQ over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota iQ consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Twingo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 32 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Toyota Aygo, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Renault Clio, Renault Kangoo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota iQ might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 2.99 m | 3.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.47 m | |
| Toyota iQ is 62 cm shorter than the Renault Twingo, 3 cm wider, while the height of Toyota iQ is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 32 litres | 230 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 959 litres | |
|
Renault Twingo has more luggage space. Toyota iQ has 198 litres less trunk space than the Renault Twingo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 7.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota iQ is 2.8 metres less than that of the Renault Twingo, which means Toyota iQ can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`345 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Toyota iQ has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Twingo has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Toyota iQ, so Toyota iQ quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota iQ has
|
Renault Twingo has
| |