Toyota Yaris 2003 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 90 NM | 100 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Yaris engine produces 7 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Mitsubishi Colt. Due to the lower power, Toyota Yaris reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Toyota Yaris consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Yaris could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Yaris consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Citroen C1, Toyota Aygo, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | Used also on Smart ForFour | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Yaris might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Yaris 2003 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.61 m | 3.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Toyota Yaris is smaller. Toyota Yaris is 26 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Colt, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Yaris is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 760 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Yaris is 1 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Toyota Yaris can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 650 | 1`450 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Toyota Yaris has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Colt has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Toyota Yaris, so Toyota Yaris quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Yaris has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |