Toyota Yaris 2011 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 99 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
| Toyota Yaris engine produces 4 HP more power than Mitsubishi Colt, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Toyota Yaris reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Yaris is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Yaris consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that by driving the Toyota Yaris over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Yaris consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 22 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris, Toyota Verso, Toyota iQ | Used also on Smart ForFour | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota Yaris engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Yaris 2011 1.3 engine: The engine is known for its reliability but exhibits several common issues, especially as mileage increases. Owners report minor oil consumption, which tends to grow over time due to piston ring coking. Individual ignition ... More about Toyota Yaris 2011 1.3 engine Mitsubishi Colt 2008 1.3 engine: The Mitsubishi 4A90 is a 1.3-liter aluminum four-cylinder engine with a timing chain, used mainly in compact Mitsubishi models. It is a simple and lightweight unit designed with fuel economy in mind, but over time several characteristic weaknesses tend ... More about Mitsubishi Colt 2008 1.3 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.89 m | 3.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.55 m | |
| Toyota Yaris is 6 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Colt, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Yaris is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 286 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1032 litres | |
|
Toyota Yaris has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Mitsubishi Colt may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Yaris is 1.4 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Toyota Yaris can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`470 kg | 1`460 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`090 kg | 970 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 380 kg | 490 kg | |
| Toyota Yaris load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 29 procentiem less than Mitsubishi Colt. Therefore, Mitsubishi Colt is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Yaris has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Yaris has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |