Toyota Yaris 2014 vs Suzuki Swift 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 99 HP | 94 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Toyota Yaris is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Yaris engine produces 5 HP more power than Suzuki Swift, whereas torque is 7 NM more than Suzuki Swift. Thanks to more power Toyota Yaris reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Toyota Yaris consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that by driving the Toyota Yaris over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Yaris consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Suzuki Swift engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris, Toyota Verso | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Suzuki Ignis | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Yaris might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota Yaris engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.89 m | 3.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.51 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Yaris is 4 cm longer than the Suzuki Swift, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 286 litres | 211 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 528 litres | |
|
Toyota Yaris has more luggage capacity. Toyota Yaris has 75 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Yaris is 1 metres less than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Toyota Yaris can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`490 | 1`480 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Toyota Yaris has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Swift has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Toyota Yaris, so Toyota Yaris quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 17 600 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Yaris has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |