Toyota Yaris 2003 vs Ford KA 1997
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 68 HP | 60 HP | |
Torque: | 90 NM | 105 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 15.4 seconds | |
Toyota Yaris is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Yaris engine produces 8 HP more power than Ford KA, but torque is 15 NM less than Ford KA. Thanks to more power Toyota Yaris reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 6.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
The Toyota Yaris is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Yaris consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford KA, which means that by driving the Toyota Yaris over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Yaris consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford KA. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 42 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
880 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
750 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
Toyota Yaris gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 320'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford KA engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 21 years | 6 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Citroen C1, Toyota Aygo, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | Used also on Ford Fiesta | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Yaris might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Toyota Yaris 2003 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.61 m | 3.62 m | |
Width: | 1.66 m | 1.63 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.37 m | |
Toyota Yaris is 1 cm shorter than the Ford KA, 3 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Yaris is 13 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 305 litres | 186 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
950 litres | 724 litres | |
Toyota Yaris has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Toyota Yaris has 119 litres more trunk space than the Ford KA. The Ford KA may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Yaris (by 226 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`320 | 1`265 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | low | |
Toyota Yaris has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford KA has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Toyota Yaris, so Toyota Yaris quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1400 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Yaris has
|
Ford KA has
| |