Toyota Yaris 2005 vs Renault Clio 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 87 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 121 NM | 105 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Toyota Yaris is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Yaris engine produces 12 HP more power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Renault Clio. Thanks to more power Toyota Yaris reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
By specification Toyota Yaris consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Yaris could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Yaris consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 26 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Dacia Logan, Renault Kangoo, Renault Twingo, Dacia Sandero | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota Yaris engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Yaris 2005 1.3 engine: Engines with higher mileage tend to lose oil both through combustion and leaks, with consumption becoming noticeable past 150,000 km. Around the same time, the timing chain may stretch as the hydraulic ... More about Toyota Yaris 2005 1.3 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.75 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.42 m | |
| Toyota Yaris is 6 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 6 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Yaris is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 275 litres | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1086 litres | 1037 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Toyota Yaris has 20 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. The Renault Clio may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Yaris (by 49 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Yaris is 0.9 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Toyota Yaris can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`480 | 1`450 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Toyota Yaris has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 170 percent more cases than Toyota Yaris, so Toyota Yaris quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 10.0/10 | 5.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Yaris has
|
Renault Clio has
| |