Toyota Yaris 2024 vs Renault Clio 2023
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Hybrid | |
| Petrol engines (Toyota Yaris) are generally cheaper to purchase and maintain, with simpler mechanics and consistent highway performance. Hybrid (Renault Clio) engines, on the other hand, provide significantly better fuel efficiency and lower emissions, especially in urban and stop-and-go traffic conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 304 HP | 94 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.1 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Toyota Yaris is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Yaris engine produces 210 HP more power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 252 NM more than Renault Clio. Thanks to more power Toyota Yaris reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 4.2 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 17.60 € | no data | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 39 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 530 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | 142 mm (5.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Clio can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Clio version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.44 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 174 litres | 391 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1069 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Toyota Yaris has 217 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Yaris is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`520 kg | 1`758 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`300 kg | 1`238 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 220 kg | 520 kg | |
| Toyota Yaris load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is more than two times less than Renault Clio. Therefore, Renault Clio is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 24 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Yaris has
|
Renault Clio has
| |