Toyota Yaris 2020 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2016
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
| Toyota Yaris engine produces 3 HP more power than Mitsubishi ASX, but torque is 9 NM less than Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 6.1 | |
|
The Toyota Yaris is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Yaris consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Toyota Yaris over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi ASX version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from three 4x4 versions of Mitsubishi ASX 2016 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Mitsubishi ASX 2016 1.6 engine: The Mitsubishi 4A92 is a 1.6-liter inline four-cylinder engine with a timing chain, known primarily for its low fuel consumption and relatively simple construction. It is widely used in models such as the Lancer and ASX. While the engine is fairly economical and inexpensive to maintain, it also has ... More about Mitsubishi ASX 2016 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.94 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Toyota Yaris is smaller. Toyota Yaris is 36 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Yaris is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 286 litres | 384 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
947 litres | 1219 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX has more luggage space. Toyota Yaris has 98 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi ASX (by 272 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Yaris is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi ASX, which means Toyota Yaris can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`405 kg | 1`870 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`100 kg | 1`260 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 305 kg | 610 kg | |
| Toyota Yaris load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is more than two times less than Mitsubishi ASX. Therefore, Mitsubishi ASX is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 15 400 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Yaris has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |