Toyota Yaris 2017 vs Suzuki Swift 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 111 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 136 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Toyota Yaris is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Yaris engine produces 21 HP more power than Suzuki Swift, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Suzuki Swift. Thanks to more power Toyota Yaris reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 5.2 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Yaris consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Yaris could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Yaris consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 37 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | 115 mm (4.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota Yaris can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Toyota Yaris version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Suzuki Swift engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Suzuki Ignis | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 3.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.50 m | |
| Toyota Yaris is 11 cm longer than the Suzuki Swift, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Yaris is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 347 litres | 265 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 947 litres | |
|
Toyota Yaris has more luggage capacity. Toyota Yaris has 82 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`365 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Toyota Yaris scores higher in safety tests, but Suzuki Swift is better rated in child safety tests. The Toyota Yaris scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Toyota Yaris has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Swift has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Toyota Yaris, so Toyota Yaris quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 800 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Yaris has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |