Toyota Yaris 2017 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 111 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 136 NM | 106 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Toyota Yaris is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Yaris engine produces 31 HP more power than Mitsubishi Space Star, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Star. Thanks to more power Toyota Yaris reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 4.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Yaris consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Yaris could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Yaris consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | 150 mm (5.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Space Star can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi Space Star version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 320'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Space Star engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 13 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 3.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Toyota Yaris is larger. Toyota Yaris is 15 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 347 litres | 235 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 912 litres | |
|
Toyota Yaris has more luggage capacity. Toyota Yaris has 112 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Star. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Yaris is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means Toyota Yaris can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`490 | 1`340 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 400 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Yaris has
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |