Toyota Yaris 2003 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.5 | 1.1 - 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 106 HP | 68 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 90 - 170 NM | 100 - 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 13.6 seconds | 8 - 14.5 seconds | |
| In general, Mitsubishi Colt are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Toyota Yaris. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 6.9 | 4.4 - 6.8 | |
|
Toyota Yaris petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Colt. On average, Toyota Yaris equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.62 m | 3.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Toyota Yaris is smaller. Toyota Yaris is 24 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Colt, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Yaris is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 305 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
950 litres | 760 litres | |
| Toyota Yaris has 195 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Yaris (by 190 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Yaris is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`368 kg | ~ 1`497 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 964 kg | ~ 1`005 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 404 kg | ~ 492 kg | |
| Toyota Yaris load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 22 procentiem less than Mitsubishi Colt. Therefore, Mitsubishi Colt is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Yaris has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |