Toyota Verso 2009 vs Renault Scenic 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 126 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Toyota Verso is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Verso engine produces 16 HP more power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Renault Scenic. Thanks to more power Toyota Verso reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 4.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Verso consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Verso could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Verso consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1460 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 1530 km on highway | ||
| 870 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4, Toyota Auris | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota Verso engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Verso 2009 2.0 engine: The 2.0-liter Toyota 1AD-FTV diesel engine, also known as the 2.0 D-4D, was produced from 2005 to 2018. In 2009, with the shift to Euro 5 emission standards, the engine was updated with piezo injectors replacing the earlier electromagnetic ones. It features an IHI RHF4 ... More about Toyota Verso 2009 2.0 engine Renault Scenic 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Scenic 2012 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.64 m | |
| Toyota Verso is 7 cm longer than the Renault Scenic, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Verso is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 178 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 178 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 484 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1696 litres | 1870 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Toyota Verso has more luggage space (by 14 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 174 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Verso is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`260 | 1`967 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Scenic is better rated in child safety tests. The Toyota Verso scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Toyota Verso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Scenic has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Toyota Verso, so Toyota Verso quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Verso has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |