Toyota Verso 2009 vs Ford C-Max 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 126 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Verso engine produces 14 HP less power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Ford C-Max. Due to the lower power, Toyota Verso reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
By specification Toyota Verso consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Verso could require 75 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Verso consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris, Toyota Corolla Verso | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Ford Mondeo, Ford Focus, Ford Galaxy, Ford S-Max | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Verso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.63 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Verso is 6 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 178 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 178 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 484 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1696 litres | 1684 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Toyota Verso has more luggage space (by 52 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Verso (by 12 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Verso is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`260 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford C-Max is better rated in child safety tests. The Toyota Verso scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Toyota Verso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford C-Max has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Toyota Verso, so Toyota Verso quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 5400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 6.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Verso has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |