Toyota Verso 2010 vs Volkswagen Touran 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 99 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Touran is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Verso engine produces 6 HP less power than Volkswagen Touran, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Volkswagen Touran. Due to the lower power, Toyota Verso reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Verso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Verso consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran, which means that by driving the Toyota Verso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Verso consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Touran gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volkswagen Touran engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris, Toyota Yaris, Toyota iQ | Installed on at least 14 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Fabia, Seat Altea, Skoda Yeti | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Toyota Verso 2010 1.3 engine: The engine is known for its reliability but exhibits several common issues, especially as mileage increases. Owners report minor oil consumption, which tends to grow over time due to piston ring coking. Individual ignition ... More about Toyota Verso 2010 1.3 engine Volkswagen Touran 2010 1.2 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its lifetime is relatively short. Vibration at idling speed tends to be excessive. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Toyota Verso is smaller. Toyota Verso is 41 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Touran, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Verso is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 695 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
623 litres | 1989 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Touran has more luggage space. Toyota Verso has 265 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Touran. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Touran (by 1366 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Verso is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Touran. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`515 | 2`080 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Toyota Verso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Touran has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Toyota Verso, so Toyota Verso quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Verso has
|
Volkswagen Touran has
| |