Toyota Verso 2010 vs Renault Scenic 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 99 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Renault Scenic is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Verso engine produces 11 HP less power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 115 NM less than Renault Scenic. Due to the lower power, Toyota Verso reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Toyota Verso consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Verso could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Verso consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris, Toyota Yaris, Toyota iQ | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota Verso engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Verso 2010 1.3 engine: The engine is known for its reliability but exhibits several common issues, especially as mileage increases. Owners report minor oil consumption, which tends to grow over time due to piston ring coking. Individual ignition ... More about Toyota Verso 2010 1.3 engine Renault Scenic 2009 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Scenic 2009 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Toyota Verso is smaller. Toyota Verso is 35 cm shorter than the Renault Scenic, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Verso is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 437 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
623 litres | 1837 litres | |
| Toyota Verso has 7 litres less trunk space than the Renault Scenic. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 1214 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Verso is 0.2 metres less than that of the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`515 | 1`944 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Toyota Verso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Scenic has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Toyota Verso, so Toyota Verso quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Verso has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |