Toyota Verso 2010 vs Renault Modus 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 99 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 105 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 13.5 seconds | |
|
Toyota Verso is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Verso engine produces 24 HP more power than Renault Modus, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Renault Modus. Thanks to more power Toyota Verso reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Verso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Verso consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Modus, which means that by driving the Toyota Verso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Verso consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Modus. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 49 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Modus gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris, Toyota Yaris, Toyota iQ | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Clio, Dacia Logan, Renault Kangoo, Renault Twingo, Dacia Sandero | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota Verso engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Verso 2010 1.3 engine: The engine is known for its reliability but exhibits several common issues, especially as mileage increases. Owners report minor oil consumption, which tends to grow over time due to piston ring coking. Individual ignition ... More about Toyota Verso 2010 1.3 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 3.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.59 m | |
| Toyota Verso is 12 cm longer than the Renault Modus, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 217 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
623 litres | 1302 litres | |
| Toyota Verso has 213 litres more trunk space than the Renault Modus. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Modus (by 679 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Verso is 0.4 metres more than that of the Renault Modus, which means Toyota Verso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`515 | 1`610 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Toyota Verso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Modus has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Toyota Verso, so Toyota Verso quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Verso has
|
Renault Modus has
| |