Toyota Verso 2010 vs Nissan Cube 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 99 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Nissan Cube is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Verso engine produces 11 HP less power than Nissan Cube, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Nissan Cube. Due to the lower power, Toyota Verso reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Verso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Verso consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Cube, which means that by driving the Toyota Verso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Verso consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Cube. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 360'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Cube engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris, Toyota Yaris, Toyota iQ | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Almera, Nissan Juke, Nissan Note, Nissan Micra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Cube might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota Verso engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Verso 2010 1.3 engine: The engine is known for its reliability but exhibits several common issues, especially as mileage increases. Owners report minor oil consumption, which tends to grow over time due to piston ring coking. Individual ignition ... More about Toyota Verso 2010 1.3 engine Nissan Cube 2010 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 3.98 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.67 m | |
| Toyota Verso is 1 cm longer than the Nissan Cube, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Verso is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
623 litres | 1563 litres | |
| Toyota Verso has 175 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Cube. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Cube (by 940 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Verso is 0.6 metres more than that of the Nissan Cube, which means Toyota Verso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`515 | 1`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Verso has
|
Nissan Cube has
| |