Toyota Verso 2010 vs Ford C-Max 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 99 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Verso engine produces 16 HP less power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Ford C-Max. Due to the lower power, Toyota Verso reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Verso consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Verso could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Verso consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 1370 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Toyota Verso 2010 1.3 engine: The engine is known for its reliability but exhibits several common issues, especially as mileage increases. Owners report minor oil consumption, which tends to grow over time due to piston ring coking. Individual ignition ... More about Toyota Verso 2010 1.3 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Toyota Verso is smaller. Toyota Verso is 39 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Verso is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
623 litres | 1684 litres | |
| Toyota Verso has 2 litres less trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford C-Max (by 1061 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Verso is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`515 | 1`915 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Toyota Verso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford C-Max has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Toyota Verso, so Toyota Verso quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Verso has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |