Toyota Verso 2010 vs Citroen Nemo 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 99 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 18 seconds | |
|
Toyota Verso is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Verso engine produces 31 HP more power than Citroen Nemo, but torque is 35 NM less than Citroen Nemo. Thanks to more power Toyota Verso reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen Nemo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Verso consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Nemo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Verso could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Verso consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Nemo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen Nemo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen Nemo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 2 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris, Toyota Yaris, Toyota iQ | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Verso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Verso 2010 1.3 engine: The engine is known for its reliability but exhibits several common issues, especially as mileage increases. Owners report minor oil consumption, which tends to grow over time due to piston ring coking. Individual ignition ... More about Toyota Verso 2010 1.3 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 2.02 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.72 m | |
| Toyota Verso is 3 cm longer than the Citroen Nemo, 32 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Verso is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 360 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
623 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota Verso has more luggage capacity. Toyota Verso has 70 litres more trunk space than the Citroen Nemo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Verso is 0.8 metres more than that of the Citroen Nemo, which means Toyota Verso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`515 | 1`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Verso has
|
Citroen Nemo has
| |