Toyota Verso 2010 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 99 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Verso engine produces 13 HP less power than Citroen C4 Picasso, whereas torque is 145 NM less than Citroen C4 Picasso. Due to the lower power, Toyota Verso reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 4.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Verso consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Verso could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Verso consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 1370 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 1440 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C4 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris, Toyota Yaris, Toyota iQ | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C5, Peugeot 207, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Toyota Verso 2010 1.3 engine: The engine is known for its reliability but exhibits several common issues, especially as mileage increases. Owners report minor oil consumption, which tends to grow over time due to piston ring coking. Individual ignition ... More about Toyota Verso 2010 1.3 engine Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 1.6 engine: This diesel engine is known for its high reliability and impressive lifespan, combined with excellent fuel efficiency for its power output. It features hydraulic lifters in the cylinder head and uses a Common ... More about Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Toyota Verso is smaller. Toyota Verso is 45 cm shorter than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Verso is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 537 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
623 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has more luggage space. Toyota Verso has 107 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`515 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Toyota Verso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 Picasso has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Toyota Verso, so Toyota Verso quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Verso has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |