Toyota Verso 2013 vs Renault Scenic 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 126 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Toyota Verso is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Verso engine produces 16 HP more power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Renault Scenic. Thanks to more power Toyota Verso reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 4.0 | |
|
The Renault Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Verso consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Verso could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1300 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4, Toyota Auris | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota Verso engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Verso 2013 2.0 engine: The 2.0-liter Toyota 1AD-FTV diesel engine, also known as the 2.0 D-4D, was produced from 2005 to 2018. In 2009, with the shift to Euro 5 emission standards, the engine was updated with piezo injectors replacing the earlier electromagnetic ones. It features an IHI RHF4 ... More about Toyota Verso 2013 2.0 engine Renault Scenic 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Scenic 2016 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.65 m | |
| Toyota Verso is 5 cm longer than the Renault Scenic, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Verso is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 484 litres | 572 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1740 litres | 1554 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Toyota Verso has 88 litres less trunk space than the Renault Scenic. This could mean that the Toyota Verso uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Verso (by 186 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`260 | 2`097 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Verso has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |