Toyota Verso 2013 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 126 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Verso engine produces 24 HP less power than Citroen C4 Picasso, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Citroen C4 Picasso. Due to the lower power, Toyota Verso reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Toyota Verso consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Verso could require 105 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Verso consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1300 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 1440 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 530'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen C4 Picasso engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4, Toyota Auris | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4, Peugeot 5008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Verso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Verso 2013 2.0 engine: The 2.0-liter Toyota 1AD-FTV diesel engine, also known as the 2.0 D-4D, was produced from 2005 to 2018. In 2009, with the shift to Euro 5 emission standards, the engine was updated with piezo injectors replacing the earlier electromagnetic ones. It features an IHI RHF4 ... More about Toyota Verso 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Verso is 3 cm longer than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Verso is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 484 litres | 537 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1740 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota Verso has 53 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C4 Picasso. This could mean that the Toyota Verso uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Verso is 0.8 metres more than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means Toyota Verso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`260 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Toyota Verso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 Picasso has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Toyota Verso, so Toyota Verso quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Verso has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |