Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 vs Suzuki SX4 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 132 NM | 156 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
| Toyota Urban Cruiser engine produces 17 HP less power than Suzuki SX4, whereas torque is 24 NM less than Suzuki SX4. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 7.2 | |
|
The Toyota Urban Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Urban Cruiser consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki SX4, which means that by driving the Toyota Urban Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 23 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Yaris | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Vitara | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki SX4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.93 m | 4.15 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Toyota Urban Cruiser is smaller. Toyota Urban Cruiser is 22 cm shorter than the Suzuki SX4, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Urban Cruiser is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 270 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`425 | 1`650 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Urban Cruiser has
|
Suzuki SX4 has
| |