Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 vs Toyota Yaris 2012
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 138 NM | 111 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
| Toyota Urban Cruiser engine produces 9 HP more power than Toyota Yaris, whereas torque is 27 NM more than Toyota Yaris. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 36 litres | |
| Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 1.5 engine: The NZ engine series was specifically developed by Toyota for compact cars. First introduced in 1997, these engines are still in production today, proving their longevity and reliability. With proper ... More about Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.93 m | 3.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.51 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Urban Cruiser is 3 cm longer than the Toyota Yaris, 3 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Urban Cruiser is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 286 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`425 | 1`565 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Toyota Yaris scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Urban Cruiser has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |