Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 vs Skoda Yeti 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 138 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota Urban Cruiser engine produces 4 HP more power than Skoda Yeti, but torque is 37 NM less than Skoda Yeti. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 60 litres | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Urban Cruiser engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 28 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Yaris | Installed on at least 14 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Fabia, Seat Altea | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Skoda Yeti engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 1.5 engine: The NZ engine series was specifically developed by Toyota for compact cars. First introduced in 1997, these engines are still in production today, proving their longevity and reliability. With proper ... More about Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 1.5 engine Skoda Yeti 2009 1.2 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its lifetime is relatively short. Vibration at idling speed tends to be excessive. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.93 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Toyota Urban Cruiser is smaller. Toyota Urban Cruiser is 29 cm shorter than the Skoda Yeti, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Urban Cruiser is 17 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 405 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`425 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Yeti scores higher in safety tests. The Toyota Urban Cruiser scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Urban Cruiser has
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |