Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 138 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
| Toyota Urban Cruiser engine produces 8 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 16 NM less than Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 6.0 | |
|
The Toyota Urban Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Urban Cruiser consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Toyota Urban Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Urban Cruiser engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 28 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Yaris | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Urban Cruiser might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 1.5 engine: The NZ engine series was specifically developed by Toyota for compact cars. First introduced in 1997, these engines are still in production today, proving their longevity and reliability. With proper ... More about Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.93 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Toyota Urban Cruiser is smaller. Toyota Urban Cruiser is 37 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Urban Cruiser is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 419 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1219 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`425 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mitsubishi ASX scores higher in safety tests. The Toyota Urban Cruiser scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Urban Cruiser has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |