Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 vs Toyota Auris 2010
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 132 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Toyota Urban Cruiser is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Urban Cruiser engine produces 10 HP less power than Toyota Auris, but torque is 73 NM more than Toyota Auris. Despite less power, Toyota Urban Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.8 | |
|
The Toyota Urban Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Urban Cruiser consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Auris, which means that by driving the Toyota Urban Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Auris gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Toyota Auris 2010 1.3 engine: The engine is known for its reliability but exhibits several common issues, especially as mileage increases. Owners report minor oil consumption, which tends to grow over time due to piston ring coking. Individual ignition ... More about Toyota Auris 2010 1.3 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.93 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Toyota Urban Cruiser is smaller, but slightly higher. Toyota Urban Cruiser is 32 cm shorter than the Toyota Auris, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Urban Cruiser is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 314 litres | 354 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 777 litres | |
|
Toyota Auris has more luggage space. Toyota Urban Cruiser has 40 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Auris. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`720 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Urban Cruiser has
|
Toyota Auris has
| |