Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 vs Suzuki SX4 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 156 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Suzuki SX4 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Urban Cruiser engine produces 30 HP less power than Suzuki SX4, but torque is 49 NM more than Suzuki SX4. Due to the lower power, Toyota Urban Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 6.2 | |
|
The Toyota Urban Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Urban Cruiser consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki SX4, which means that by driving the Toyota Urban Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.93 m | 4.15 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Toyota Urban Cruiser is smaller. Toyota Urban Cruiser is 22 cm shorter than the Suzuki SX4, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Urban Cruiser is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 314 litres | 270 litres | |
|
Toyota Urban Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Toyota Urban Cruiser has 44 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki SX4. The Suzuki SX4 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`650 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Urban Cruiser has
|
Suzuki SX4 has
| |